Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Markets

An $11,000-a-Day Token Borrowed $75 Million Against Itself on Cronos

Validators halted Crypto.com's chain and rolled its state back to before the attack. About $6 million had already crossed to Ethereum; the rest sits on a ledger whose history has now been rewritten.

By Sarah Blake··4 min read
An $11,000-a-Day Token Borrowed $75 Million Against Itself on Cronos

Key Points

  • Validators halted Crypto.com's chain and rolled its state back to before the attack.
  • About $6 million had already crossed to Ethereum; the rest sits on a ledger whose history has now been rewritten.

Cronos validators stopped producing blocks on 30 August after an attacker drained roughly $75 million from Tectonic, the largest lending protocol on Crypto.com's chain, by inflating the price of Tectonic's own governance token and borrowing against it. The network came back online at 23:49 UTC the same day, restarted from block 90,896,189 with its state restored to a point before the exploit. Everything that happened on Cronos in between has been erased.

The mechanics were not sophisticated. TONIC had about $1.34 million of liquidity and roughly $11,000 of daily trading volume, and Tectonic accepted it as collateral at a 20% factor, meaning each $100 of recognised TONIC value could support $20 of borrowing. On-chain researcher Weilin Li traced the attacker pushing TONIC's price up about 100-fold in around 20 minutes, depositing the inflated tokens and borrowing liquid assets against them. Li put the position at roughly 364.6 trillion TONIC, which by his arithmetic would have needed to be valued near $375 million to unlock $75 million of loans. He first identified about $66 million and later found a second address holding close to $8 million more. Neither Tectonic nor Cronos has confirmed a figure.

Tectonic's own documentation warned that low-liquidity assets are particularly susceptible to price manipulation. The protocol listed one anyway, at a collateral factor that treated it as a fifth as good as cash. This was not a code failure. The contracts did what their parameters told them to do, and the parameters were set by people who had read the warning and shipped regardless.

Advertisement

728×90

It is the third attack of this shape in a fortnight. Moonwell lost $8.7 million on Base last week when an attacker manipulated the price of a thinly traded token used as collateral, and a roughly 3% move in a thin Pendle market triggered about $36 million of liquidations on Morpho. The difference on Cronos is what happened afterwards. Base kept producing blocks and Moonwell's money left. Cronos, which caps its validator set at 100, coordinated a shutdown within minutes and stranded most of the proceeds on-chain. Around $6 million had already bridged to Ethereum by then, according to Li.

Then it did something more consequential than halting. Rather than resuming from the block where validators stopped, the network restored an earlier state. Cronos described the halt as a "validator-consensus emergency action" and confirmed the restoration in its restart notice.

A rollback means the attacker's transactions no longer exist in the canonical chain. It also means every other transaction in the affected window no longer exists either, and Cronos has not yet published how far back the restoration reached, how validators agreed on the target state, or what happens to users whose legitimate transfers landed in the discarded blocks. Node operators were told to restart on v1.7.8 with snapshots dated 31 August at 09:52 UTC, and Cronos warned that some protocols, RPC providers, explorers and bridges would take longer to return. A full postmortem is promised.

The precedent everyone cites is BNB Chain in October 2022, when 26 validators paused the network after a bridge exploit and recovered close to $470 million of the $570 million taken. That episode settled an argument the industry prefers not to have: a chain that can be switched off by a small validator set is a chain whose neutrality is conditional, and the condition is that the people running it consider the cause sufficient. Cronos has now used that power for a lending protocol's governance mistake. The bar for the next use is lower than it was a week ago.

The damage to Tectonic itself is already visible. DefiLlama put the protocol at about $121.7 million of total value locked on 26 August, close to half of all capital deposited across Cronos DeFi, with around $82.7 million in active loans. By Monday that figure was roughly $3 million. Tectonic's last public posts before the incident were in May and June, warning users to withdraw one asset and reducing borrowing limits on others; whatever process produced those decisions did not get as far as TONIC.

Crypto.com chief executive Kris Marszalek said the exchange and app were not compromised and that the company's security team was assisting. The exchange launched Cronos in 2021 and uses it for cheaper transactions across its own products, and CRO is the token it holds up as the centre of its plans, plans that lost a headline sponsor on 7 August when Trump Media, Crypto.com and Yorkville Acquisition Corp terminated their proposed CRO treasury venture. Other chains have handled worse with less: BounceBit killed its layer 1 outright after a $3 million exploit it could not patch, and Sandbox froze its bridges after an attacker minted $49 billion of unbacked SAND.

Tectonic and Cronos have not published a final accounting of the loss, a root cause, or a timeline for the postmortem.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Babylon Asked Aave to Take Native Bitcoin as V4 Collateral
Markets

The request for comment would add two new Spokes to Aave V4, one for borrowing stablecoins against bitcoin held in Babylon's vaults and one for settling liquidations. Risk parameters are not in the paper, and Aave DAO would take the first $500,000 of annual revenue from the market before sharing any with Babylon.

·MiningPool Staff
Robinhood Chain Trading Fell a Quarter in a Week as Deposits Held
Markets

Volume across exchanges on Robinhood Chain was $6.80 billion in the seven days to Sunday, down 26.9% from the previous seven days, while daily active addresses fell 18% week over week. Deposits held in the chain's applications rose 4.1% over the same stretch to $1.05 billion, and Robinhood is still covering the network fee on wallet swaps until the end of December.

·MiningPool Staff
Polkadot Launched dotUSD With a Reserve Made Entirely of USDT
Markets

DOT holders authorized the stablecoin through OpenGov, and Polkadot says it has no issuing company, but the live phase mints only against Tether's USDT and an administrator can stop minting or halt swaps outright. DOT collateral, price oracles and liquidations are planned for a later stage.

·MiningPool Staff
Drift's Recovery Pool Pays About a Cent on Every Dollar Lost
Markets

The Drift Foundation issued one DFX token for each verified dollar taken in April's exploit, and the pool behind those 299.5 million tokens holds about $3.11 million. Tether and other partners have pledged up to $147.5 million more, none of which has arrived.

·MiningPool Staff
NEAR Intents Says an Omni Bridge Bug Cost It About $3.8 Million
Markets

The protocol halted services, patched the contract-side flaw and promised to compensate users in full, naming eleven networks whose deposits and withdrawals would stay down for another 12 hours. Investigators who traced the outflows do not agree on where the money went.

·MiningPool Staff
Comer Widened the Insider Trading Probe to Hyperliquid and Crypto.com
Policy

Three letters dated Tuesday also go to Aristotle Exchange, which runs PredictIt, and each sets the same return date of October 13. The Hyperliquid letter's central example is not an event contract but a leveraged short on bitcoin and ether perpetuals, and the $1.1 billion figure attached to it sits in a footnote citing a press column.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.