Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Policy

China Bans Initial Coin Offerings

China's People's Bank and other government agencies have declared initial coin offerings illegal and issued directives prohibiting banks and financial institutions from conducting ICO-related business.

By Oliver Bradford··2 min read
China Bans Initial Coin Offerings

Key Points

  • China's People's Bank and other government agencies have declared initial coin offerings illegal and issued directives prohibiting banks and financial institutions from conducting ICO-related business.

Seven Chinese government agencies including the People's Bank of China have declared initial coin offerings illegal fundraising activity and prohibited all organizations and individuals from raising capital through token sales. The joint statement labelled ICOs as disrupting economic and financial stability whilst creating risks for investors.

The regulatory action represented a dramatic escalation of Chinese government pressure on cryptocurrency activities. Rather than implementing measured oversight comparable to other major economies, China's authorities opted for comprehensive prohibition. Banks and financial institutions received explicit orders to cease all ICO-related services, payments, and trading platforms.

Advertisement

728×90

Chinese regulators expressed particular concern about fraud and market manipulation within the ICO market. They noted that many projects made exaggerated claims about development progress and token utility. Inexperienced retail investors were pouring life savings into speculative projects with minimal due diligence, creating conditions for massive losses.

The government also worried that ICOs facilitated capital flight out of China. As investors purchased tokens with Chinese yuan, the capital left the country and entered foreign banking systems. This capital outflow contradicted China's efforts to stabilise domestic currency and prevent wealth from departing the mainland.

The ban's implementation created immediate hardship for Chinese investors and entrepreneurs who had committed capital to ICO projects. All existing ICOs were required to refund investor capital, though the mechanics of recovering billions of dollars' worth of ether proved challenging. Some projects proved unable or unwilling to follow through on refund obligations.

The announcement sent shockwaves through global cryptocurrency markets. China had become the world's largest trading center for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, with major exchanges based in Beijing and Shanghai handling the bulk of global transaction volume. Regulatory action against crypto in China automatically created selling pressure worldwide.

Bitcoin's price plunged in response to the announcement, falling sharply as traders feared additional regulatory restrictions might follow. The cryptocurrency market lost approximately $35 billion in capitalization within four days as the ICO ban took effect. This demonstrated how sensitive cryptocurrency valuations had become to regulatory events in major economies.

Chinese entrepreneurs responded by relocating ICO operations offshore. Many projects moved to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Switzerland, continuing token sales from jurisdictions with less hostile regulatory environments. This regulatory arbitrage would prove temporary, as governments worldwide eventually developed ICO frameworks addressing similar concerns raised by Chinese authorities.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff
The SEC Gave Tokenized Stock Venues Five Years and Tight Caps
Policy

Venues can trade tokenized National Market System stock without registering as exchanges, on notice rather than approval. A venue may list at most 75 Tier 1 names, a tier that takes in S&P 500 and Russell 1000 stocks, and trade no more than 0.25 percent of a name's average daily volume in the prior month.

·MiningPool Staff
Korean Police Referred 18 Polymarket Users to Prosecutors
Policy

The Gangwon Provincial Police registered 26 domestic users as criminal suspects and referred 18 of them, a month after Korea's communications regulator blocked the platform. Police argue that staking crypto on an outcome the buyer cannot control meets the elements of gambling under Article 246.

·MiningPool Staff
Two Ex-Robinhood Engineers Charged Over Hyperliquid Perp Trades
Policy

Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang each face one Commodity Exchange Act count and one wire fraud count over perpetual futures bought before Robinhood announced listings. Trading derivatives rather than spot tokens is what routes the case through commodities law.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.