Markets
BTC
ETH
SOL
XRP
BNB
ADA
DOGE
MCap
BTC
ETH
SOL
XRP
BNB
ADA
DOGE
MCap
Policy

Any Firm Serving Iran's Crypto Sector Can Now Be Sanctioned

OFAC's digital assets determination sits alongside four others under Executive Order 13902, and landed with nearly 60 designations including a UAE-based broker Treasury says moved over $100 million in crypto for the Qods Force.

By Aubrey Swanson··3 min read
Any Firm Serving Iran's Crypto Sector Can Now Be Sanctioned

Key Points

  • OFAC's digital assets determination sits alongside four others under Executive Order 13902, and landed with nearly 60 designations including a UAE-based broker Treasury says moved over $100 million in crypto for the Qods Force.

The US Treasury issued a determination on Monday that allows it to sanction any person anywhere in the world operating in Iran's digital asset sector.

That is a different instrument from the designations announced alongside it, and a considerably more consequential one. Until Monday, OFAC's blanket sectoral authority under Executive Order 13902 reached Iran's financial and petroleum industries. It now reaches digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping — five determinations issued at once under a campaign Treasury has named Operation Economic Outcast, which Secretary Scott Bessent has been calling Economic D-Day.

Treasury announced the campaign with the wartime framing fully intact.

Bessent said the objective was "to sever every economic lifeline that sustains this tyrannical regime until Tehran stands alone." Countries will be given individual timelines to wind down Iran-related activity before secondary sanctions follow. Treasury's supporting language on crypto was blunt: the regime "increasingly turns to cryptocurrency as a tool of choice for sanctions evasion."

Advertisement

728×90

A sectoral determination names nobody. It establishes that operating in a defined part of the Iranian economy is, on its own, sufficient grounds for designation. For an exchange, a custodian, a market maker or an infrastructure provider, that changes the shape of the compliance problem. The question is no longer whether a counterparty appears on a list. It is whether the firm can be shown to operate in or provide services to Iran's digital asset sector at all, and non-US companies carry that exposure equally, because the authority reaches foreign persons wherever they are incorporated.

What the determination cannot do is reach the parts of the sector with no legal address. Sanctions work on entities that can be named, banked and cut off: exchanges with corporate registrations, brokers with bank accounts, firms with counterparties who fear secondary exposure. A peer-to-peer trade between two Iranian wallets does not fit that description. The cost falls on the institutional layer and leaves the retail one intact, which has been the pattern in crypto sanctions since Tornado Cash was designated in 2022 and its most durable consequence turned out to be a prison sentence for a developer.

Roughly 60 entities, individuals and vessels were designated alongside the determinations, two of them with direct crypto links. Ivan Obukhov, a Ukrainian national based in the United Arab Emirates, has since 2023 processed more than $100 million in cryptocurrency payments to facilitate oil sales on behalf of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' Qods Force, according to Treasury. Obukhov has brokered shadow fleet vessels for years, and his UAE company Foscom FZE was designated with him.

The second is Arman Kahzadian, described by Treasury as part of a group of cyber actors directed by Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security and focused on digital asset theft. Treasury said he took control of a wallet holding over $30,000 in bitcoin in the summer of 2023. Thirty thousand dollars does not move an economy. It was enough for a designation under the cyber sanctions authority, which is a fair indication of where the threshold now sits.

Monday's action follows a steady escalation. OFAC made its first designation of a crypto exchange operating in Iran's financial sector in January, naming Zedcex and Zedxion. It sanctioned the exchange Nobitex over terrorist financing. Earlier this month it blocked a scheme selling bitcoin-priced insurance for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and on 7 August designated the exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether. Every one of those actions was a name. Monday's determination is a category.

Europe has been moving along a parallel track with less ambition. HTX and ten other platforms lost Binance transfer access under an EU sanctions sweep this month, a narrower action aimed at specific venues rather than an industry. Both jurisdictions are converging on the same treatment of crypto infrastructure: sanctionable plumbing, subject to the same instruments as shipping and banking, rather than a novel technology requiring novel rules.

Tehran dismissed the campaign before it landed. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called Washington "desperate" and said the measures amounted to "the same movie they keep playing over and over again." Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said any country that takes part in sanctions against Iran "will be regarded as an enemy."

The rial fell to a record open-market low of 2.02 million to the dollar on Monday.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.