Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Policy

OFAC Designates First-Ever Crypto Exchange for Iran Sanctions Evasion

The US Treasury's OFAC designated Zedcex Exchange Ltd and Zedxion Exchange Ltd on January 30, 2026, marking the first-ever sanctions action against a crypto exchange.

By MiningPool Staff··2 min read
OFAC Designates First-Ever Crypto Exchange for Iran Sanctions Evasion

Key Points

  • The US Treasury's OFAC designated Zedcex Exchange Ltd and Zedxion Exchange Ltd on January 30, 2026, marking the first-ever sanctions action against a crypto exchange.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control, the Treasury Department agency responsible for enforcing US sanctions, designated Zedcex Exchange Ltd and Zedxion Exchange Ltd on January 30, 2026. The action marked the first-ever OFAC designation of a digital asset exchange operating in Iran's financial sector.

OFAC's previous enforcement actions in crypto focused on individual wallets, protocols, and mixing services. The Tornado Cash protocol was sanctioned in August 2022 for facilitating money laundering and sanctions evasion. Individual wallets associated with ransomware groups and terrorist financing have been designated. But designating an exchange represented an escalation—targeting infrastructure that facilitated large-scale transactions rather than specific wallets.

Zedcex and Zedxion operated as centralized trading platforms in Iran, providing access to cryptocurrency trading for Iranian users and institutions. By converting fiat to crypto and vice versa, these exchanges served as gateways between Iran's financial system and global crypto markets. This function made them targets for sanctions enforcement.

Advertisement

728×90

The designation carried legal consequences for US persons. Any American citizen or US-based entity is prohibited from transacting with Zedcex or Zedxion. Doing so violates the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and can result in civil penalties up to $500,000 per violation or criminal penalties. Major exchanges like Coinbase, Kraken, and Binance immediately delisted Iranian users to ensure compliance.

The enforcement action reflected a broader strategy shift toward targeting infrastructure that facilitates sanctions evasion at scale. OFAC traditionally focused on state actors and terrorist organizations. But over the 2024-2026 period, the agency expanded its enforcement to reach crypto platforms that unknowingly or deliberately enabled sanctions circumvention.

Iran has faced comprehensive US sanctions since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. Nuclear sanctions were imposed in 2006 and expanded following the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action withdrawal. Cryptocurrency became an increasingly important tool for Iran to access global financial systems while evading sanctions. The country's oil exports could not be sold on global markets, but value derived from oil could be converted to crypto and moved through unregulated channels.

Zedcex and Zedxion's designation put other exchanges operating in sanctioned jurisdictions on notice. OFAC was willing to impose penalties on platforms that facilitated sanctions evasion. Exchanges operating globally faced the choice of complying with comprehensive geographic blocking or facing designation.

The designation also raised compliance questions for exchanges. Before the action, it was unclear whether a platform could knowingly serve a sanctioned country through legal means. OFAC answered in the negative—a platform that facilitates transactions for Iranian entities violates law, even if done transparently.

This enforcement set precedent for future exchange designations. If Venezuela, North Korea, or other sanctioned actors attempted to establish crypto platforms, they would face similar OFAC action. The effect was to push crypto trading activity further into decentralized protocols that OFAC cannot designate and unregulated channels that it cannot reach.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff
The SEC Gave Tokenized Stock Venues Five Years and Tight Caps
Policy

Venues can trade tokenized National Market System stock without registering as exchanges, on notice rather than approval. A venue may list at most 75 Tier 1 names, a tier that takes in S&P 500 and Russell 1000 stocks, and trade no more than 0.25 percent of a name's average daily volume in the prior month.

·MiningPool Staff
Korean Police Referred 18 Polymarket Users to Prosecutors
Policy

The Gangwon Provincial Police registered 26 domestic users as criminal suspects and referred 18 of them, a month after Korea's communications regulator blocked the platform. Police argue that staking crypto on an outcome the buyer cannot control meets the elements of gambling under Article 246.

·MiningPool Staff
Two Ex-Robinhood Engineers Charged Over Hyperliquid Perp Trades
Policy

Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang each face one Commodity Exchange Act count and one wire fraud count over perpetual futures bought before Robinhood announced listings. Trading derivatives rather than spot tokens is what routes the case through commodities law.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.