Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Policy

Galaxy Cut CLARITY Act Odds to 30% After the Senate Skipped the Vote

Majority Leader John Thune said the crypto market-structure bill wouldn't reach the floor before the August 7 recess. Galaxy's Alex Thorn set the odds of 2026 passage at 30 per cent, down from 50 last month.

By Oliver Bradford··4 min read
Galaxy Cut CLARITY Act Odds to 30% After the Senate Skipped the Vote

Key Points

  • Majority Leader John Thune said the crypto market-structure bill wouldn't reach the floor before the August 7 recess.
  • Galaxy's Alex Thorn set the odds of 2026 passage at 30 per cent, down from 50 last month.

The CLARITY Act, the crypto industry's central legislative project of 2026, will not reach the Senate floor before the chamber breaks for August recess. Majority Leader John Thune told reporters he does not expect a vote before members leave Washington on or around August 7, pointing to a queue of federal nominations and a Russia sanctions bill dedicated to the late Senator Lindsey Graham as the immediate priorities.

The Senate returns in early September with a midterm-shortened calendar and no obvious window to reconcile a market-structure bill with the House version before the election cycle swallows the agenda. A continuing resolution to fund the government will consume most of September, and any 2026 market-structure vote will then have to compete with a shutdown fight, appropriations bills, and the campaign itself.

Galaxy Research read the arithmetic and moved. Head of research Alex Thorn cut the odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 from 50 per cent to 30, arguing that the coalition needed to clear the 60-vote threshold is not visibly in place and that the bill now requires a last-ditch effort and a legislative grand bargain to reach the president's desk. Thorn set the practical deadline for Senate voting at July 30 — a date that has now passed without a text on the floor.

Advertisement

728×90

The stated reason for the delay is calendar management. The real reason is an ethics fight over the president's family crypto business. Seven Senate Democrats rejected the ethics provision negotiated into the bill as insufficient to prevent Trump from profiting off legislation his administration would enforce, and compromise talks continued into last week without producing text either side would sign. The industry line has been that the ethics dispute is a distraction from the substantive bill; on the Senate floor, it is the bill.

That leaves the industry short of the outcome it spent most of the year lobbying for. BlackRock, Fidelity and a coalition of Wall Street asset managers publicly backed the bill on July 28, a coordinated push that would normally have been enough to pull a 60-vote threshold together. The GENIUS Act's passage last summer followed a similar pattern of institutional endorsement, and the working assumption in crypto policy circles was that market structure would come next.

It has not, and the reasons are structural rather than tactical. The stablecoin bill was mostly a payments story with clear consumer-protection framing. CLARITY is a market-structure bill that redraws the perimeter between the SEC and the CFTC and, by extension, decides which tokens fall under which enforcement regime. That is a harder sell to sceptical senators without the ethics backstop Democrats have been demanding, and it is exactly the sort of bill that gets caught in a partisan spat about presidential enrichment.

The House passed its own version in July, and negotiators had been hoping to run the Senate text on a similar schedule before merging the two in conference. Missing the pre-recess deadline now means any Senate bill will be conferenced against a House position that is nearly two months old by the time the chambers return, and any changes the Senate makes will need to be reconciled against the House Republicans' preferred perimeter.

The knock-on effects have already started. Coinbase, the Blockchain Association and a-16z Crypto's policy team spent July running a Washington campaign that assumed passage was probable, and public-affairs planning across the industry was built around a fourth-quarter market-structure regime. The five federal agencies that blew past their GENIUS Act rulemaking deadline in July are unlikely to accelerate on discretionary market-structure guidance without a statutory push behind them.

The token markets are pricing the delay. Bitcoin held near $63,000 through the announcement, ether traded flat around $1,860, and altcoin desks reported no meaningful positioning shift on the news — an implicit vote that traders had already discounted the bill's chances. The bigger reprice, if it comes, will be in the small-cap tokens that had been trading on the assumption that a CFTC-led regime would clear their legal path in the US market. Those are the tokens most exposed to the SEC's current enforcement posture, and their re-rating would begin the moment the market accepts that clarity is not coming this year.

Thune said he still hopes to begin the floor process before the break, which is a different thing from saying the bill will pass. For an industry that spent 18 months arguing that regulatory clarity was the missing ingredient for institutional adoption, the calendar has now delivered the answer.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

SEC's Crypto Custody Rule Is Public and Self-Custody Is a Last Resort
Policy

An adviser could hold client crypto itself only after determining in writing, and again every quarter, that no permitted custodian is available for that asset. Transactions would need two people to authorize them, and the comment period runs 60 days from Federal Register publication.

·MiningPool Staff
Comer Widened the Insider Trading Probe to Hyperliquid and Crypto.com
Policy

Three letters dated Tuesday also go to Aristotle Exchange, which runs PredictIt, and each sets the same return date of October 13. The Hyperliquid letter's central example is not an event contract but a leveraged short on bitcoin and ether perpetuals, and the $1.1 billion figure attached to it sits in a footnote citing a press column.

·MiningPool Staff
Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff
Democrats Sought a Hearing as Kalshi Met Banking Republicans Privately
Policy

Seven Senate Banking Democrats wrote to Chairman Tim Scott asking that prediction markets be examined in a public, bipartisan hearing rather than the Republican-only roundtable held Wednesday morning with Kalshi's chief executive. Their letter points at Cboe's request to list all-or-nothing options on corporate earnings, a product they argue could reach the SEC's jurisdiction.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.