Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Markets

Hong Kong Approves Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, First in Asia

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on April 15, 2024, making it the first jurisdiction in Asia to offer such products.

By MiningPool Staff··2 min read
Hong Kong Approves Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs, First in Asia

Key Points

  • Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on April 15, 2024, making it the first jurisdiction in Asia to offer such products.

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission approved spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs on April 15, 2024, establishing the territory as Asia's first jurisdiction to offer regulated exposure to major cryptocurrencies through listed investment funds.

Three fund managers received approval: ChinaAMC, Bosera, and HashKey (with Harvest Global also approved). The approved products launched trading on April 30, 2024. Hong Kong structured the ETF framework to allow in-kind creation and redemption, where authorized participants could create new ETF shares by delivering physical cryptocurrency to the fund manager rather than paying cash. This approach differed from the U.S. model, which had required cash settlement.

Advertisement

728×90

Initial trading volumes demonstrated measured market interest compared to the U.S. Bitcoin ETF approval in January 2024. Hong Kong's products recorded approximately $12 million in first-day volume combined across all issuers. In contrast, the BlackRock iShares Bitcoin ETF had generated $4.6 billion in first-day trading volume when it began trading in the United States, reflecting the significantly larger scale of U.S. capital markets and investor base.

Mainland Chinese investors faced restrictions accessing Hong Kong-listed ETFs through standard channels. The products could not be held within mainland brokerage accounts or accessed through stock connect programs. This limitation reflected the mainland's ongoing regulatory stance toward cryptocurrency, where Bitcoin and Ether trading remained prohibited for domestic investors. The restriction meant that Hong Kong's ETF approval did not immediately open China's capital base to Bitcoin exposure.

Hong Kong's approval reflected explicit policy positioning to establish itself as a global cryptocurrency hub in competition with Singapore and Dubai. The city's financial regulator had shifted from skepticism toward cryptocurrency toward a measured permission framework for regulated products. The ETF approval complemented earlier licensing of cryptocurrency exchange platforms, including Crypto.com and OSL (the sole first-tier exchange operator).

Fund managers faced regulatory requirements including custody standards, valuation procedures, and redemption processes. The SFC mandated that cryptocurrency holdings be held in segregated accounts with custodians meeting strict operational standards. Daily valuation procedures required fund administrators to mark positions to real-time market prices. These requirements aligned with Hong Kong's broader approach to regulated cryptocurrency operations.

The in-kind creation mechanism provided advantages to professional investors and market makers. Rather than exchanging cash for ETF shares, authorized participants could deliver cryptocurrency directly to obtain shares, reducing cash drag and enabling tighter bid-ask spreads. The structure also made the ETF more attractive as a vehicle for Bitcoin and Ether holders seeking regulated exposure without transacting through traditional custody providers.

Hong Kong's ETF approval positioned it ahead of other Asian financial centers lacking spot Bitcoin or Ether products. Japan had approved Bitcoin and Ether spot ETFs earlier in 2023, but Hong Kong's 2024 timing came after U.S. approval had raised global investor expectations. The approvals signaled that Asian regulatory acceptance of Bitcoin and Ether was deepening beyond earlier pilot programs and toward mainstream institutional product offerings.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff
The SEC Gave Tokenized Stock Venues Five Years and Tight Caps
Policy

Venues can trade tokenized National Market System stock without registering as exchanges, on notice rather than approval. A venue may list at most 75 Tier 1 names, a tier that takes in S&P 500 and Russell 1000 stocks, and trade no more than 0.25 percent of a name's average daily volume in the prior month.

·MiningPool Staff
Korean Police Referred 18 Polymarket Users to Prosecutors
Policy

The Gangwon Provincial Police registered 26 domestic users as criminal suspects and referred 18 of them, a month after Korea's communications regulator blocked the platform. Police argue that staking crypto on an outcome the buyer cannot control meets the elements of gambling under Article 246.

·MiningPool Staff
Two Ex-Robinhood Engineers Charged Over Hyperliquid Perp Trades
Policy

Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang each face one Commodity Exchange Act count and one wire fraud count over perpetual futures bought before Robinhood announced listings. Trading derivatives rather than spot tokens is what routes the case through commodities law.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.