Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Markets

Kraken Settles with SEC for $30 Million Over Staking Program

Kraken agreed on February 9, 2023, to pay $30 million and cease its US staking-as-a-service program after the SEC alleged it constituted an unregistered securities offering.

By MiningPool Staff··4 min read
Kraken Settles with SEC for $30 Million Over Staking Program

Key Points

  • Kraken agreed on February 9, 2023, to pay $30 million and cease its US staking-as-a-service program after the SEC alleged it constituted an unregistered securities offering.

Kraken, one of the largest US-regulated cryptocurrency exchanges, agreed on February 9, 2023, to pay a $30 million civil fine and immediately shut down its staking-as-a-service program in the United States. The Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that Kraken's staking service constituted an unregistered securities offering, marking the first major enforcement action against cryptocurrency exchange staking services.

Kraken's staking program had enabled users to stake their Ethereum, Solana, and other cryptocurrencies through Kraken's infrastructure while earning yield. Customers deposited coins with Kraken, which assumed operational responsibility for running validator software, managing keys, and directing earnings back to customers. In exchange, Kraken retained a portion of staking rewards as a fee. For users uncomfortable with staking infrastructure complexity, Kraken's service provided a simplified pathway to participate in proof-of-stake networks.

The SEC's enforcement action held that staking-as-a-service programs like Kraken's constituted investment contracts under the Securities Act of 1933, specifically securities under the SEC's interpretation of the Howey test. The agency argued that customers invested money in Kraken's staking service with a reasonable expectation of profits derived from Kraken's managerial efforts. This characterization brought the product into the regulatory category of securities offerings, requiring registration unless an exemption applied.

Kraken's countervailing argument held that staking rewards derived from protocol economics rather than from Kraken's efforts. Validators secured the blockchain and were compensated by the protocol directly; Kraken merely provided operational and software support services. In this view, the service was operational infrastructure, not an investment contract. The SEC rejected this framing, establishing that management of assets on behalf of customers for profit constituted securities provision regardless of the ultimate source of the profits.

The $30 million fine was substantial but not unprecedented in SEC cryptocurrency enforcement. The agency had issued larger penalties in some cases, but the staking enforcement represented a higher proportional fine relative to the program's revenue. Kraken agreed not only to pay the fine but to wind down the US staking program entirely, ceasing to accept new US customers or deposits into the staking service.

Advertisement

728×90

The settlement included explicit SEC language that operating a staking-as-a-service program in the United States without SEC approval and registration would not be permitted. Kraken could not resume the program unless it either registered with the SEC or found an exemption, a process that appeared unlikely given the SEC's enforcement posture.

SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce, the agency's most vocal crypto-friendly commissioner, dissented from the enforcement action. Peirce argued that the SEC was overreaching by characterizing staking services as securities and that the agency lacked clear authority to regulate blockchain staking activities. She contended that the decision would chill innovation in cryptocurrency infrastructure and that Congress, not the SEC, should determine regulatory policy for digital assets.

Peirce's dissent articulated concerns shared by cryptocurrency industry participants about regulatory overreach. The SEC had not provided clear guidance before the Kraken enforcement that staking programs would be classified as securities offerings. Kraken had operated the service in good faith, believing it was compliant with existing regulations. The enforcement action arrived retroactively, establishing new regulatory positions without prior notice.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong responded to the Kraken settlement by announcing that Coinbase would continue offering its staking program and would fight any SEC enforcement action. Armstrong declared that Coinbase's legal analysis indicated staking services were not securities offerings and that the company would defend its position in court rather than settle. This public position signaled industry pushback against the SEC's staking interpretation and suggested that further litigation would follow.

Kraken's CEO at the time of the settlement had shifted after co-founder Jesse Powell stepped down from daily operations in 2022. Dave Ripley assumed leadership of Kraken following Powell's departure. Ripley negotiated the settlement and managed the company's response to the SEC action.

The staking enforcement had immediate practical impacts on Kraken's business. The company ceased offering US customers access to the staking program, forced to redirect those customers toward alternative providers or self-staking infrastructure. Internationally, Kraken continued operating staking services outside US jurisdiction, enabling customers in other geographies to maintain access.

The settlement distinguished between domestic US enforcement and international operations, reflecting the SEC's jurisdiction limits. Kraken could maintain staking services for non-US customers, though this geographic fragmentation created operational complexity and required separate infrastructure and compliance protocols for different regions.

The staking enforcement raised broader regulatory questions about how the SEC would treat other yield-generating cryptocurrency services. Lending protocols, yield farms, and other DeFi applications offering returns to depositors faced potential SEC scrutiny under similar logic. The enforcement established that providing custody and operational services while taking a share of returns could trigger securities regulation, a principle with substantial implications across cryptocurrency services.

The implications extended to smaller exchanges and decentralized finance protocols that offered staking or yield services. Many operated without clear regulatory guidance and potentially at risk of SEC enforcement. The Kraken settlement provided a public statement of the SEC's regulatory position, forcing industry participants to reevaluate their business models and compliance postures.

Kraken settled with the SEC on February 9, 2023, agreeing to pay $30 million and cease its US staking program. The enforcement action established the SEC's position that staking-as-a-service programs constitute unregistered securities offerings, marking the first major regulatory action against cryptocurrency exchange staking services and triggering broader industry response and ongoing litigation with competitors like Coinbase.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff
The SEC Gave Tokenized Stock Venues Five Years and Tight Caps
Policy

Venues can trade tokenized National Market System stock without registering as exchanges, on notice rather than approval. A venue may list at most 75 Tier 1 names, a tier that takes in S&P 500 and Russell 1000 stocks, and trade no more than 0.25 percent of a name's average daily volume in the prior month.

·MiningPool Staff
Korean Police Referred 18 Polymarket Users to Prosecutors
Policy

The Gangwon Provincial Police registered 26 domestic users as criminal suspects and referred 18 of them, a month after Korea's communications regulator blocked the platform. Police argue that staking crypto on an outcome the buyer cannot control meets the elements of gambling under Article 246.

·MiningPool Staff
Two Ex-Robinhood Engineers Charged Over Hyperliquid Perp Trades
Policy

Hefu Chai and Huaisong Xiang each face one Commodity Exchange Act count and one wire fraud count over perpetual futures bought before Robinhood announced listings. Trading derivatives rather than spot tokens is what routes the case through commodities law.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.