Markets
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
BTC— —
ETH— —
SOL— —
XRP— —
BNB— —
ADA— —
DOGE— —
MCap— —
Policy

The Stablecoin Yield Deadlock Just Broke — Coinbase Got the Compromise It Wanted and the CLARITY Act Lost Its Last Excuse

Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks finalised the language on stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act on Friday, ending the months-long deadlock that had killed the bill's momentum. The compromise bans passive yield but preserves activity-based rewards — and Coinbase keeps the revenue stream that mattered most.

By Aubrey Swanson··4 min read
The Stablecoin Yield Deadlock Just Broke — Coinbase Got the Compromise It Wanted and the CLARITY Act Lost Its Last Excuse

Key Points

  • Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks finalised the language on stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act on Friday, ending the months-long deadlock that had killed the bill's momentum.
  • The compromise bans passive yield but preserves activity-based rewards — and Coinbase keeps the revenue stream that mattered most.

Coinbase's policy team confirmed Friday that Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks have finalised the language on stablecoin rewards in the CLARITY Act, ending the months-long deadlock that had quietly killed the bill's momentum. The compromise bans passive yield on idle stablecoin balances — anything functionally equivalent to interest on a bank deposit — but preserves activity-based rewards tied to using crypto platforms and networks. Banks claim the headline. Coinbase keeps the revenue stream that matters most to its earnings.

The numbers explain why the fight took this long. Coinbase made $1.35 billion in stablecoin income in 2025 — roughly 20% of net revenue. A blanket ban on stablecoin yield would have ripped a hole in the company's P&L; the banking lobby spent eight months arguing for exactly that, framing it as deposit-flight risk to community lenders. Tillis, who had asked for more time on the bill just days earlier as Galaxy Digital downgraded its 2026-passage odds to a coin flip, eventually brokered the language with Alsobrooks. The result is messier than what either side wanted, which is usually how Senate compromises read.

Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's Chief Policy Officer, broke the news on X with a statement that called much of the prior debate "based on imagined risks, not real evidence." Read it for what it is — a victory lap thinly disguised as a procedural update.

Advertisement

728×90

The mechanic the bill protects is what the industry calls a usage-based reward: a payout tied to a customer actually doing something on a platform, rather than letting funds sit idle. In practice, the line between "yield" and "rewards" can be blurred to the point of meaninglessness — a point critics on both sides have made since the draft text circulated in March. Galaxy's Alex Thorn told clients on Friday that the release of the yield text suggests a Senate Banking Committee markup is now imminent, possibly as soon as the week of May 11. That tracks with what Senator Bernie Moreno told reporters last week, when he warned that missing a May deadline could push market-structure legislation past the midterms.

What the deal does not do is settle every fight inside the CLARITY Act. Token classification, the line between SEC and CFTC authority, the treatment of decentralised finance protocols, and developer-liability protections all remain live questions; the Digital Chamber, a Washington-based industry group, has flagged each as an unresolved structural issue that will shape both the timing of the bill and the strength of its final framework. Removing the yield deadlock is necessary but not sufficient — though it does leave Tillis and the bill's other Republican champions with one fewer reason to ask for another delay.

Markets read the news as bullish. Bitcoin held above $78,000 through the weekend, with traders treating the development as the second concrete legislative win of the year after the SEC and CFTC's joint token taxonomy in March. Stablecoin issuers now have a clearer path to compete with bank deposits without claiming to be one — a distinction that, until Friday, had no enforceable definition in US law. The compromise text fixes that.

The reaction inside crypto Twitter has been split, predictably. Coinbase loyalists declared the outcome a win. DeFi commentators — including some prominent decentralisation maximalists — argued that banning passive yield is regulatory capture by another name, designed to stop banks from having to compete with on-chain alternatives that can pay six times their savings rates. Both camps have a point. The bill protects Coinbase's existing business model and entrenches a centralised-issuer regime; it also closes off the most aggressive form of consumer-facing yield, which had been a regulatory question mark since the GENIUS Act became federal law last summer.

For Coinbase, the stakes are existential rather than incremental. The company has built much of its post-IPO growth narrative around stablecoin distribution, and the yield component was the part that kept the regulatory risk score elevated. With that risk removed — at least at the federal level — the policy team can pivot to the harder fights still inside the bill. Coinbase's USDC partnership with Circle is the asset that benefits most from this outcome; a regulated, yield-eligible USDC backed by short-dated Treasuries is the financial product Coinbase has been telegraphing for two years.

The banking lobby has not given up. Industry groups representing community banks released statements within hours of the deal calling the rewards carve-out a loophole, signalling they will lobby for tighter implementing regulations once the bill passes. They will lose that fight in the short term and probably win some of it in the long term. That is how this kind of legislation always ends.

MiningPool content is intended for information and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice.

Advertisement

728×90

Related Stories

SEC's Crypto Custody Rule Is Public and Self-Custody Is a Last Resort
Policy

An adviser could hold client crypto itself only after determining in writing, and again every quarter, that no permitted custodian is available for that asset. Transactions would need two people to authorize them, and the comment period runs 60 days from Federal Register publication.

·MiningPool Staff
Comer Widened the Insider Trading Probe to Hyperliquid and Crypto.com
Policy

Three letters dated Tuesday also go to Aristotle Exchange, which runs PredictIt, and each sets the same return date of October 13. The Hyperliquid letter's central example is not an event contract but a leveraged short on bitcoin and ether perpetuals, and the $1.1 billion figure attached to it sits in a footnote citing a press column.

·MiningPool Staff
Sixth Circuit Ruled Kalshi's Sports Contracts Are Not Swaps
Policy

A unanimous panel held that Kalshi's sports event contracts are not swaps because a game result carries no financial consequence of its own, affirming Ohio's refusal of an injunction and vacating Tennessee's. Three appeals courts have now ruled and Kalshi has won one of them, with New Jersey's petition already waiting at the Supreme Court.

·MiningPool Staff
Aave Opened a USDC Market Backed by Seven Coinbase Stock Tokens
Markets

The Equities Hub on Base takes tokenized Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia and four other stocks as collateral at 65 to 79 percent, capped at about $29 million, and lends only USDC against them. The market runs continuously while the Chainlink feed pricing that collateral stops publishing from Friday evening until Sunday evening Eastern.

·MiningPool Staff
SEC Staff Made a Working Network the Test for Buybacks and Upgrades
Policy

The Division of Corporation Finance's updated crypto FAQs answer buyback, maintenance and marketing questions the same way: once a system is functional, none of it counts as the essential managerial effort that makes a token an investment contract. The staff attached the reverse warning to networks that do not yet work, and noted the answers have no legal force.

·MiningPool Staff
Kalshi Has Until November 9 to Answer New Jersey at the Supreme Court
Policy

New Jersey's petition asking whether Dodd-Frank preempts state sports betting law reached the Supreme Court on September 2, and the first amicus brief was docketed three weeks later. The clerk has since pushed the deadline for a response to November 9, which keeps the petition off the justices' conference list until late November at the earliest.

·MiningPool Staff

Stay informed

Verifiable crypto journalism, delivered to your inbox.

Weekday mornings. No hype. No financial advice. Just what happened and why it matters.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.